Skip to main content
Overview

An Individual Evacuation Plan (IEP) framework in Japan designed specifically for individuals with special needs who require assistance during natural hazards.

    Map
    Country
    Japan
    Geolocation

    Japan Special Needs Evacuation Plan

    Contributor
    ISIG
    Summary Description

    A structured system where Japanese municipalities and welfare institutions create personalized evacuation strategies for vulnerable people, verified through inclusive drills and coordinated with local support networks.

    Context & Background

    High incidence of natural hazards and a 2021 regulatory change in Japan requiring welfare institutions to create individual plans for those needing support.

    Problem Addressed

    The need for specialized assistance during evacuations that general plans do not sufficiently cover for individuals with functional needs.

    Vulnerable Groups

    Persons with functional needs who require specialized assistance during an evacuation.

    Governance

    Coordination between client, family, social workers, administrative staff, NGOs, and neighbors.

    Emergency Preparedness

    Mandatory identification lists, functional assessments, and individual plans verified through drills.

    Infrastructure Readiness

    Integration of welfare institutions and municipality administrative lists.

    Purpose of Engagement

    To build personal relationships between residents with and without disabilities while ensuring safety.

    Methods of Engagement

    Professional assessments, coordination meetings with all relevant actors, and inclusive evacuation drills.

    Degree of Influence & Decision-Making

    Users and their families actively participate in meetings to define specific help roles.

    Capacity-Building & Long-Term Empowerment

    Fosters personal relationships and trust between neighbors and those with special needs.

    Key Features & Innovations

    Integration of professional social work into disaster planning and the mandatory nature of individual-level plans.

    Language(s)

    Japanese

    Implementing Organisation(s)

    Japanese Municipalities and Welfare Institutions.

    Experience of the Implementing Organisation in DRRM

    Long history of managing natural hazards and updated 2021 legal mandates.

    Actors Involved

    Social workers, family members, welfare professionals, administrative staff, NGOs, and neighbors.

    Implementation Steps
    1. Identify individuals.
    2. Professional functional assessment.
    3. Stakeholder coordination meeting.
    4. Draft IEP.
    5. Verify through drills.
    6. Adapt/Adopt.
    Resources Required

    Professional expertise (social workers), community volunteers (neighbors), and administrative oversight.

    Timeframe & Phases

    Ongoing process from identification to verification/adaptation through drills.

    Lessons Learned from Implementation

    Individual planning creates essential social bonds and drills are necessary to confirm plan viability.

    Challenges & Adaptive Strategies

    Addresses the specific functional needs of each individual rather than applying a "one size fits all" approach.

    Risk & Mitigation Plan

    Individual plans are verified and adapted based on the outcomes of inclusive drills.

    Sustainability Model

    Driven by national regulatory changes and mandatory municipal requirements.

    Scalability & Adaptability

    Applicable to any welfare-state context where social workers and municipal records are present.

    Technology & Innovation

    Mandatory digital/administrative lists for identifying support needs.

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Direct Costs

    Staff time for social workers and administrative management.

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Operational Costs

    Costs associated with conducting regular inclusive drills.

    Lessons Learned

    Coordination between diverse actors (family, NGOs, neighbors) is key to a functional individual plan.